Advertisement
AMDWF vs ATS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMDWF is a Hold and ATS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMDWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileATS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMDWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ATS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ATS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ATS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMDWF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ATS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -8.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-2.87% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| AMDWF | ATS | AMDWF / ATS | |
| Capitalization | 3.55B | 2.41B | 147% |
| EBITDA | 73.8B | 158M | 46,709% |
| Gain YTD | 2.008 | -18.832 | -11% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.16 | 46.39 | 31% |
| Revenue | 401B | 2.58B | 15,567% |
| Total Cash | 123B | 189M | 65,079% |
| Total Debt | 12.1B | 1.52B | 797% |
AMDWF | ATS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 73 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMDWF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATS (76). This means that AMDWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATS’s over the last 12 months.
ATS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as AMDWF (80). This means that ATS’s stock grew similarly to AMDWF’s over the last 12 months.
ATS's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AMDWF (98). This means that ATS’s stock grew similarly to AMDWF’s over the last 12 months.
AMDWF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ATS (73). This means that AMDWF’s stock grew similarly to ATS’s over the last 12 months.
ATS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMDWF (45). This means that ATS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMDWF’s over the last 12 months.
| AMDWF | ATS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 12% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
AMDWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMDWF has been loosely correlated with SKUYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMDWF jumps, then SKUYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMDWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMDWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SKUYF - AMDWF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMDLY - AMDWF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATS - AMDWF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ALFVF - AMDWF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AALBF - AMDWF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATS has been loosely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ATS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| FELE - ATS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| NPO - ATS | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| DOV - ATS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| RRX - ATS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| NDSN - ATS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||