AMEGF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
PMCOF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

AMEGF vs PMCOF

Header iconAMEGF vs PMCOF Comparison
Open Charts AMEGF vs PMCOFBanner chart's image
AMERICAN EAGLE GOLD
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$112
CapitalizationN/A
PROSPECTOR METALS
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.29K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AMEGF vs PMCOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
AMEGF vs. PMCOF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMEGF is a Hold and PMCOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AMEGF: $0.38 vs. PMCOF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: AMEGF and PMCOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMEGF: 169% vs. PMCOF: 4%
Market capitalization -- AMEGF: $19.17M vs. PMCOF: $5.64M
AMEGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.17M. PMCOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMEGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMEGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMEGF and PMCOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AMEGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.98% price change this week, while PMCOF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMEGF($19.2M) has a higher market cap than PMCOF($5.64M). AMEGF YTD gains are higher at: 87.224 vs. PMCOF (6.178). AMEGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.82M vs. PMCOF (-7M). PMCOF has more cash in the bank: 2.97M vs. AMEGF (1.51M). AMEGF (0) and PMCOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMEGFPMCOFAMEGF / PMCOF
Capitalization19.2M5.64M340%
EBITDA-2.82M-7M40%
Gain YTD87.2246.1781,412%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.51M2.97M51%
Total Debt57.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCOF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

AMEGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMEGF and MXTLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMEGF and MXTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMEGF
1D Price
Change %
AMEGF100%
+0.46%
MXTLF - AMEGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERYTF - AMEGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - AMEGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSIIF - AMEGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSVRF - AMEGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More

PMCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCOF and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCOF and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCOF
1D Price
Change %
PMCOF100%
-13.00%
MAIFF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
KSTBF - PMCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGOF - PMCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
TINFF - PMCOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-6.40%
AMEGF - PMCOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More