AMFC
Price
$22.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.47M
FSUN
Price
$33.97
Change
+$0.25 (+0.74%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
727.79M
17 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMFC vs FSUN

Header iconAMFC vs FSUN Comparison
Open Charts AMFC vs FSUNBanner chart's image
AMB Financial
Price$22.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$550
Capitalization18.47M
FirstSun Capital Ban
Price$33.97
Change+$0.25 (+0.74%)
Volume$129.1K
Capitalization727.79M
AMFC vs FSUN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMFC vs. FSUN commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFC is a Hold and FSUN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMFC: $22.00 vs. FSUN: $33.97)
Brand notoriety: AMFC and FSUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMFC: 35% vs. FSUN: 128%
Market capitalization -- AMFC: $18.47M vs. FSUN: $727.79M
AMFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.47M. FSUN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $727.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMFC is a better buy in the long-term than FSUN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSUN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AMFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while FSUN (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUN($728M) has a higher market cap than AMFC($18.5M). AMFC YTD gains are higher at: 8.975 vs. FSUN (-15.181). AMFC has less debt than FSUN: AMFC (37.9M) vs FSUN (80.4M). FSUN has higher revenues than AMFC: FSUN (351M) vs AMFC (4.57M).
AMFCFSUNAMFC / FSUN
Capitalization18.5M728M3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.975-15.181-59%
P/E RatioN/A9.37-
Revenue4.57M351M1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt37.9M80.4M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMFC: Fundamental Ratings
AMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSUN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XSHD12.730.20
+1.60%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF
KRE51.420.46
+0.90%
SPDR® S&P Regional Banking ETF
FXP14.110.05
+0.39%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
NANC34.270.09
+0.26%
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
DIAX13.50-0.14
-1.03%
Nuveen DOW 30Sm Dynamic Overwrite Fund

AMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMFC has been loosely correlated with MFDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMFC jumps, then MFDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMFC
1D Price
Change %
AMFC100%
N/A
MFDB - AMFC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HMST - AMFC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FSUN - AMFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
MBBC - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
GNTY - AMFC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

FSUN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUN has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSUN jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUN
1D Price
Change %
FSUN100%
+0.74%
ALRS - FSUN
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
UBFO - FSUN
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
CPF - FSUN
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
HIFS - FSUN
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
BCAL - FSUN
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More