AMFL vs BOIVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFL is a Hold and BOIVF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBOIVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BOIVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BOIVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BOIVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMFL (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -21.64% price change this week, while BOIVF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was -6.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (-0.51% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| AMFL | BOIVF | AMFL / BOIVF | |
| Capitalization | 18K | 18B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.39B | - |
| Gain YTD | -28.277 | -6.180 | 458% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 94.34 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 22.3B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.35B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 7.53B | - |
AMFL | BOIVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMFL's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOIVF (88). This means that AMFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOIVF’s over the last 12 months.
BOIVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMFL (100). This means that BOIVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMFL’s over the last 12 months.
BOIVF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMFL (100). This means that BOIVF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMFL’s over the last 12 months.
AMFL's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BOIVF (72). This means that AMFL’s stock grew similarly to BOIVF’s over the last 12 months.
BOIVF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMFL (100). This means that BOIVF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMFL’s over the last 12 months.
| AMFL | BOIVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 57% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSHEX | 36.06 | 0.97 | +2.76% |
| Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest No Load | |||
| PGIEX | 30.17 | 0.27 | +0.90% |
| Putnam Focused Equity C | |||
| SCUIX | 31.29 | 0.22 | +0.71% |
| Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I | |||
| TSEGX | 14.64 | 0.06 | +0.41% |
| Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Inst | |||
| NBGEX | 65.30 | 0.17 | +0.26% |
| Neuberger Berman Genesis Tr | |||
AMFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMFL and BSEG have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMFL and BSEG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMFL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMFL | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| BSEG - AMFL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| BOIVF - AMFL | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| BRSE - AMFL | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIOSF - AMFL | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATVDY - AMFL | 2% Poorly correlated | +5.94% | ||
More | ||||
BOIVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOIVF has been loosely correlated with VIVHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOIVF jumps, then VIVHY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOIVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOIVF | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| VIVHY - BOIVF | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| UMGNF - BOIVF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| NWSA - BOIVF | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| WBD - BOIVF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| NWS - BOIVF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||