Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMFNX vs LOTAX
AMFNX vs LOTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LOTAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LOTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMFNX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. LOTAX (285M). LOTAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LOTAX (5.14) vs AMFNX (1.85). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LOTAX: AMFNX (8 years) vs LOTAX (11 years). LOTAX (2.02) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.44). LOTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: LOTAX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). LOTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.95 vs. AMFNX (-16.77). LOTAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.18 vs. AMFNX (-10.95).
| AMFNX | LOTAX | AMFNX / LOTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.02 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 2.02 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.789 | -4.288 | 368% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 285M | 442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 5.14 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.77 | -3.95 | 425% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.30 | -23.12 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.95 | 9.18 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.19 | - |