AMGDF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.04 (-4.88%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
801.66M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BMCLF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMGDF vs BMCLF

Header iconAMGDF vs BMCLF Comparison
Open Charts AMGDF vs BMCLFBanner chart's image
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings
Price$0.78
Change-$0.04 (-4.88%)
Volume$500
Capitalization801.66M
Baic Mtr
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.96B
AMGDF vs BMCLF Comparison Chart in %
AMGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BMCLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMGDF vs. BMCLF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGDF is a Hold and BMCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (AMGDF: $0.78 vs. BMCLF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: AMGDF and BMCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMGDF: 3% vs. BMCLF: 3%
Market capitalization -- AMGDF: $794.78M vs. BMCLF: $1.96B
AMGDF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $794.78M. BMCLF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $38.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBMCLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BMCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than AMGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMCLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BMCLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMGDF is a better buy in the short-term than BMCLF.

Price Growth

AMGDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while BMCLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-4.68% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMCLF($1.96B) has a higher market cap than AMGDF($802M). BMCLF YTD gains are higher at: -16.374 vs. AMGDF (-44.684).
AMGDFBMCLFAMGDF / BMCLF
Capitalization802M1.96B41%
EBITDA118MN/A-
Gain YTD-44.684-16.374273%
P/E RatioN/A17.59-
Revenue1.33BN/A-
Total Cash124MN/A-
Total Debt1.46BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMGDF vs BMCLF: Fundamental Ratings
AMGDF
BMCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2441
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9575
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
305
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5024

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMCLF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMGDF (59). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (100). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (95). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (83). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BMCLF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AMGDF (30). This means that BMCLF’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGDFBMCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BMCLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRSHX13.880.07
+0.51%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C
FCPAX34.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Capl App A
ALVSX11.13N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val I
STMMX34.99N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Real Estate A
PGLRX18.48-0.21
-1.12%
Putnam Focused International Equity R

AMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMGDF has been loosely correlated with ARGGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMGDF jumps, then ARGGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMGDF
1D Price
Change %
AMGDF100%
-4.88%
ARGGY - AMGDF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
STLA - AMGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
BAMXF - AMGDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPEV - AMGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
BMCLF - AMGDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More