AMGDF
Price
$1.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
NIO
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.36 (-6.53%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
144 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMGDF vs NIO

Header iconAMGDF vs NIO Comparison
Open Charts AMGDF vs NIOBanner chart's image
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings
Price$1.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
CapitalizationN/A
NIO
Price$5.15
Change-$0.36 (-6.53%)
Volume$74.65M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AMGDF vs NIO Comparison Chart
Loading...
NIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AMGDF vs. NIO commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGDF is a Hold and NIO is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AMGDF: $1.39 vs. NIO: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: AMGDF: Not notable vs. NIO: Notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMGDF: 99% vs. NIO: 105%
Market capitalization -- AMGDF: $3.75B vs. NIO: $9.96B
AMGDF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $3.75B. NIO’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $9.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIO is a better buy in the long-term than AMGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NIO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AMGDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -17.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIO is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+3.72% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIO($9.96B) has a higher market cap than AMGDF($3.75B). NIO YTD gains are higher at: -43.219 vs. AMGDF (-50.503). AMGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 163M vs. NIO (-15.88B). NIO has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. AMGDF (408M). AMGDF has less debt than NIO: AMGDF (1.21B) vs NIO (28.4B). NIO has higher revenues than AMGDF: NIO (48.5B) vs AMGDF (1.52B).
AMGDFNIOAMGDF / NIO
Capitalization3.75B9.96B38%
EBITDA163M-15.88B-1%
Gain YTD-50.503-43.219117%
P/E Ratio6.28N/A-
Revenue1.52B48.5B3%
Total Cash408M27.3B1%
Total Debt1.21B28.4B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMGDF vs NIO: Fundamental Ratings
AMGDF
NIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMGDF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (62) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that AMGDF’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as AMGDF (100) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew similarly to AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMGDF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that AMGDF’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.

NIO's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMGDF (93) in the null industry. This means that NIO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMGDF’s over the last 12 months.

AMGDF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that AMGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

AMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMGDF has been loosely correlated with ARGGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMGDF jumps, then ARGGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMGDF
1D Price
Change %
AMGDF100%
+6.74%
ARGGY - AMGDF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
STLA - AMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
BAMXF - AMGDF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIO - AMGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
XPEV - AMGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More