It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMGN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBIIB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMGN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BIIB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMGN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -3.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.49%.
AMGN is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| AMGN | BIIB | AMGN / BIIB | |
| Capitalization | 171B | 25.5B | 671% |
| EBITDA | 16.5B | 2.93B | 564% |
| Gain YTD | 26.526 | 13.850 | 192% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.57 | 15.87 | 155% |
| Revenue | 36B | 10.1B | 356% |
| Total Cash | 9.45B | 3.96B | 239% |
| Total Debt | 54.6B | 6.59B | 829% |
AMGN | BIIB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMGN's Valuation (15) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (91). This means that AMGN’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (100). This means that AMGN’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AMGN's SMR Rating (14) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (73). This means that AMGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AMGN (50). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to AMGN’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMGN (82). This means that BIIB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMGN’s over the last 12 months.
| AMGN | BIIB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 10 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 50% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDS | 35.22 | 1.62 | +4.82% |
| Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF | |||
| IDVZ | 31.38 | -0.08 | -0.25% |
| Opal International Div Inc ETF | |||
| PNQI | 54.24 | -0.30 | -0.55% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | |||
| WTMF | 38.36 | -0.22 | -0.56% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| IUSG | 166.97 | -2.80 | -1.65% |
| iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with PFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then PFE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| PFE - BIIB | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| AMGN - BIIB | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| MRK - BIIB | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| BMY - BIIB | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| AZN - BIIB | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||