Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PTCCX
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.79B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.19
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.76M
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTCCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. PTCCX (639M). AMHIX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AMHIX (4.01) vs PTCCX (3.22). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTCCX (26 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTCCX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.58 vs. PTCCX (-3.91). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.36 vs. PTCCX (-8.58).
| AMHIX | PTCCX | AMHIX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.616 | -3.582 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 639M | 2,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 3.22 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.58 | -3.91 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.96 | -0.07 | -2,778% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | -8.58 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.62 | -6.45 | -25% |