Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PTCCX
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$15.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.53B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.79M
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTCCX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PTCCX (609M). AMHIX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AMHIX (4.12) vs PTCCX (3.42). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTCCX (27 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTCCX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.05 vs. PTCCX (-2.85). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.85 vs. PTCCX (-8.42).
| AMHIX | PTCCX | AMHIX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.589 | -0.673 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 609M | 2,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.12 | 3.42 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.05 | -2.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.86 | 3.68 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.85 | -8.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.87 | -3.55 | -109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement