Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PTCCX
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.11B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets616.29M
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTCCX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. PTCCX (616M). AMHIX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AMHIX (4.07) vs PTCCX (3.38). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTCCX (27 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTCCX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.63 vs. PTCCX (-5.74). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -7.57 vs. PTCCX (-11.99).
| AMHIX | PTCCX | AMHIX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.074 | -4.203 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 616M | 1,964% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.07 | 3.38 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.63 | -5.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.08 | -3.63 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.57 | -11.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.88 | -7.05 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers