Ad is loading...
AMHIX vs PTCCX
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTCCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets656.74M
AMHIX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTCCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. PTCCX (657M). AMHIX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: AMHIX (3.98) vs PTCCX (3.16). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTCCX (26 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AMHIX (0.66). AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTCCX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. PTCCX (-2.25). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.03 vs. PTCCX (-2.36).
| AMHIX | PTCCX | AMHIX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.71 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.485 | -3.009 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 657M | 1,918% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 3.16 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -2.25 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.59 | -1.06 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.03 | -2.36 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.97 | -6.64 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers