Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PTFRX
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTFRX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.82
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.69B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.14M
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTFRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. PTFRX (641M). PTFRX pays higher dividends than AMHIX: PTFRX (4.28) vs AMHIX (4.01). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). PTFRX (0.69) and AMHIX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTFRX (25.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTFRX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.46 vs. PTFRX (-3.16). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -3.34 vs. PTFRX (-6.45).
| AMHIX | PTFRX | AMHIX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.074 | -3.489 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 641M | 1,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 4.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | -3.16 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.18 | -4.07 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.34 | -6.45 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers