Ad is loading...
AMHIX vs PTFRX
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTFRX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.42B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.4M
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTFRX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. PTFRX (632M). PTFRX pays higher dividends than AMHIX: PTFRX (4.13) vs AMHIX (3.82). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). PTFRX (0.69) and AMHIX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTFRX (25.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTFRX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.06 vs. PTFRX (-1.93). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.22 vs. PTFRX (-4.86).
| AMHIX | PTFRX | AMHIX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.139 | -3.863 | 81% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 632M | 1,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 4.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.06 | -1.93 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | -5.33 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.22 | -4.86 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...