Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMHIX vs PTFRX
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts AMHIX vs PTFRX
American High-Income Municipal Bond A
Price$14.89
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.79B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets638.76M
AMHIX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMHIX vs. PTFRX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMHIX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMHIX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. PTFRX (639M). PTFRX pays higher dividends than AMHIX: PTFRX (4.28) vs AMHIX (4.01). AMHIX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: AMHIX (31 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). PTFRX (0.69) and AMHIX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . AMHIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PTFRX (25.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMHIX: PTFRX (0) vs AMHIX (250). AMHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.58 vs. PTFRX (-3.82). AMHIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.36 vs. PTFRX (-8.18).
| AMHIX | PTFRX | AMHIX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.69 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.616 | -3.489 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 639M | 2,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 4.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.58 | -3.82 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.96 | 0.02 | 9,859% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.36 | -8.18 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.62 | N/A | - |