Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMIDX vs RNWHX
AMIDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AMIDX vs RNWHX
Amana Developing World Institutional
Price$14.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.69M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.86
Change-$0.35 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.57B
AMIDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMIDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMIDX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.6B vs. AMIDX (151M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AMIDX: RNWHX (0.97) vs AMIDX (0.74). AMIDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AMIDX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AMIDX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMIDX (1.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMIDX: RNWHX (250) vs AMIDX (100000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. AMIDX (0.99). AMIDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.61 vs. RNWHX (33.26).
| AMIDX | RNWHX | AMIDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.72 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.72 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.645 | 22.152 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 73.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.99 | 10.81 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.08 | 56.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.61 | 33.26 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers