AMKAF vs AMKBF
To understand the difference between A.P. Moller - Maersk AS - Ordinary Shares - Class A (AMKAF) vs. A.P. Moller - Maersk AS - Ordinary Shares - Class B (AMKBF) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class A and Ordinary Shares - Class B
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMKAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAMKBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMKAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- AMKBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMKAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMKBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMKAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- AMKBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMKAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while AMKBF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -3.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (-2.81% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| AMKAF | AMKBF | AMKAF / AMKBF | |
| Capitalization | 25B | 25B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 11.4B | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.597 | -7.627 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.76 | 6.90 | 98% |
| Revenue | 52.6B | 52.6B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 6.34B | 6.34B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 16.6B | 16.6B | 100% |
AMKAF | AMKBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMKAF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBF (23). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBF’s over the last 12 months.
AMKAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBF (86). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBF’s over the last 12 months.
AMKAF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBF (79). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBF’s over the last 12 months.
AMKBF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKAF (51). This means that AMKBF’s stock grew similarly to AMKAF’s over the last 12 months.
AMKAF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as AMKBF (40). This means that AMKAF’s stock grew similarly to AMKBF’s over the last 12 months.
| AMKAF | AMKBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMC | 26.98 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Global X Emerging Mkts Great Cnsmr ETF | |||
| FLYD | 15.03 | -0.08 | -0.54% |
| MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs | |||
| SNAV | 31.00 | -0.17 | -0.55% |
| Mohr Sector Nav ETF | |||
| NUMV | 36.35 | -0.29 | -0.79% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| JMEE | 63.32 | -0.84 | -1.31% |
| JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF | |||
AMKAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKAF has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMKAF jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMKAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMKBY - AMKAF | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| AMKBF - AMKAF | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.81% | ||
| ZIM - AMKAF | 33% Poorly correlated | -5.59% | ||
| MSLOY - AMKAF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NPNYY - AMKAF | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
More | ||||
AMKBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKBF has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMKBF jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMKBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKBF | 100% | -6.81% | ||
| AMKBY - AMKBF | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| AMKAF - AMKBF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZIM - AMKBF | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.59% | ||
| NPNYY - AMKBF | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
| HPGLY - AMKBF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||