Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWBX
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWBX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$14.52
Change-$0.16 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.58
Change-$0.46 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.06B
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. AMKIX (1.7B). AMKIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AMKIX (0.70) vs RNWBX (0.12). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AMKIX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than AMKIX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWBX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.38 vs. RNWBX (10.59). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.07 vs. AMKIX (18.17).
| AMKIX | RNWBX | AMKIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.885 | 21.795 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 74.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.12 | 578% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.38 | 10.59 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.67 | 56.54 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 23.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.33 | 82.92 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement