Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWBX
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWBX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$14.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.18
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
AMKIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. AMKIX (1.87B). AMKIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AMKIX (0.75) vs RNWBX (0.13). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AMKIX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than AMKIX (1.07). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWBX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.42 vs. RNWBX (16.11). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. AMKIX (20.03).
| AMKIX | RNWBX | AMKIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.67 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.866 | 22.610 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 74.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.13 | 594% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.42 | 16.11 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.49 | 46.85 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.03 | 25.99 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.81 | 89.59 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers