Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMKIX vs RNWFX
AMKIX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts AMKIX vs RNWFX
American Century Emerging Markets I
Price$12.30
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
American Funds New World R5
Price$86.08
Change+$0.62 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.02B
AMKIX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMKIX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMKIX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 67B vs. AMKIX (1.76B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than AMKIX: RNWFX (1.09) vs AMKIX (0.85). AMKIX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: AMKIX (26 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). AMKIX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AMKIX (29.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMKIX: RNWFX (250) vs AMKIX (5000000). AMKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. RNWFX (9.70). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.23 vs. AMKIX (15.88).
| AMKIX | RNWFX | AMKIX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.62 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.62 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.848 | 11.416 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.76B | 67B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 9.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.08 | 24.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.88 | 30.23 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.58 | 61.48 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement