AMN vs CCRN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a StrongBuy and CCRN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCRN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CCRN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCRN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CCRN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while CCRN (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
CCRN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+3.47% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMN | CCRN | AMN / CCRN | |
| Capitalization | 2.35B | 650M | 362% |
| EBITDA | 499M | 129M | 387% |
| Gain YTD | -22.283 | -23.238 | 96% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.59 | 9.00 | 129% |
| Revenue | 3.79B | 2.02B | 188% |
| Total Cash | 32.9M | 17.1M | 192% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 5.27M | 25,631% |
AMN | CCRN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMN's Valuation (66) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as CCRN (85). This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to CCRN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AMN (100). This means that CCRN’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's SMR Rating (90) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AMN (92). This means that CCRN’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMN (93). This means that CCRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.
CCRN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as AMN (11). This means that CCRN’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.
| AMN | CCRN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 16 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been closely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| CCRN - AMN | 73% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| AGL - AMN | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| ASTH - AMN | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| NHC - AMN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| BKD - AMN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
CCRN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCRN has been loosely correlated with AMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCRN jumps, then AMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCRN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCRN | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| AMN - CCRN | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| AGL - CCRN | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AIRS - CCRN | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.20% | ||
| LFST - CCRN | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| ACHC - CCRN | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.62% | ||
More | ||||