The 10-day moving average for AMP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 39 of 65 cases where AMP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
AMP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AMP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
The Aroon Indicator for AMP entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where AMP's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AMP as a result. In 49 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AMP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where AMP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +2.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AMP advanced for three days, in 212 of 343 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
AMP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AMP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 86 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.882) is normal, around the industry mean (3.263). P/E Ratio (11.987) is within average values for comparable stocks, (27.022). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.395) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.013) settles around the average of (0.081) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.644) is also within normal values, averaging (15.860).
PFG moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 30 of 50 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PFG as a result. In 42 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PFG turned negative on September 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 21 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 47%.
The 10-day moving average for PFG crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The Aroon Indicator for PFG entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for PFG's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +0.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFG advanced for three days, in 209 of 318 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
PFG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 11 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.021) is normal, around the industry mean (3.263). P/E Ratio (16.330) is within average values for comparable stocks, (27.022). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.410) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.081) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.647) is also within normal values, averaging (15.860).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PFG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PFG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
AMP | PFG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFG's Valuation (11) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMP (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew significantly faster than AMP’s over the last 12 months.
AMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew significantly faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.
AMP's SMR Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFG (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that AMP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFG’s over the last 12 months.
PFG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AMP (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
PFG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AMP (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PFG’s stock grew similarly to AMP’s over the last 12 months.
| AMP | PFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 21 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 25% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMP (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.07% price change this week, while PFG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.26%.
AMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMP has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMP jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| RJF - AMP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PFG - AMP | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| SEIC - AMP | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CG - AMP | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| NTRS - AMP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
More | ||||