AMROF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
157.01M
QIND
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMROF vs QIND

Header iconAMROF vs QIND Comparison
Open Charts AMROF vs QINDBanner chart's image
AMAERO
Price$0.24
Change-$0.02 (-7.69%)
Volume$110.92K
Capitalization157.01M
Quality Industrial
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$430K
Capitalization2.47M
AMROF vs QIND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMROF vs. QIND commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMROF is a Hold and QIND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AMROF: $0.24 vs. QIND: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: AMROF and QIND are both not notable
AMROF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while QIND is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMROF: 399% vs. QIND: 59%
Market capitalization -- AMROF: $157.01M vs. QIND: $2.47M
AMROF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $157.01M. QIND’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $2.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $212.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QIND is a better buy in the long-term than AMROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMROF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QIND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMROF is a better buy in the short-term than QIND.

Price Growth

AMROF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -19.19% price change this week, while QIND (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +119.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.76% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Industrial Machinery (-0.02% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMROF($157M) has a higher market cap than QIND($2.47M). AMROF YTD gains are higher at: 26.316 vs. QIND (-65.333). QIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.4M vs. AMROF (-20.95M). QIND has higher revenues than AMROF: QIND (87.1M) vs AMROF (2.01M).
AMROFQINDAMROF / QIND
Capitalization157M2.47M6,361%
EBITDA-20.95M15.4M-136%
Gain YTD26.316-65.333-40%
P/E RatioN/A0.21-
Revenue2.01M87.1M2%
Total CashN/A14.4K-
Total DebtN/A46.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QIND: Fundamental Ratings
QIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMROFQIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMEX2.060.14
+7.29%
Odyssey Marine Exploration
ACIC10.870.17
+1.59%
American Coastal Insurance Corp
DUOL322.784.85
+1.53%
Duolingo
NN17.940.15
+0.84%
NextNav
NCNA3.20-0.04
-1.23%
NuCana plc

AMROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMROF and ATLFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMROF and ATLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMROF
1D Price
Change %
AMROF100%
-7.62%
ATLFF - AMROF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
AFGVF - AMROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QIND - AMROF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
JCSE - AMROF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
AITLF - AMROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QIND and CHHGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIND and CHHGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QIND
1D Price
Change %
QIND100%
-6.73%
CHHGF - QIND
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCHN - QIND
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREMF - QIND
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.44%
HIZOF - QIND
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLFF - QIND
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
More