AMROF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.02 (+8.70%)
Updated
Jan 31 closing price
Capitalization
37.48M
QIND
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
29.79M
Ad is loading...

AMROF vs QIND

Header iconAMROF vs QIND Comparison
Open Charts AMROF vs QINDBanner chart's image
Amaero International
Price$0.25
Change+$0.02 (+8.70%)
Volume$210.74K
Capitalization37.48M
Quality Industrial
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.3K
Capitalization29.79M
AMROF vs QIND Comparison Chart
Loading...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMROF vs. QIND commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMROF is a Hold and QIND is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (QIND: $0.03)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QIND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • QIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

QIND (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -13.33% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.49% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMROF($37.5M) has a higher market cap than QIND($29.8M). AMROF YTD gains are higher at: 31.579 vs. QIND (-56.667). QIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8M vs. AMROF (-10.45M). AMROF has more cash in the bank: 4.02M vs. QIND (1.23M). AMROF has less debt than QIND: AMROF (3.12M) vs QIND (47.9M). QIND has higher revenues than AMROF: QIND (83.8M) vs AMROF (841K).
AMROFQINDAMROF / QIND
Capitalization37.5M29.8M126%
EBITDA-10.45M13.8M-76%
Gain YTD31.579-56.667-56%
P/E RatioN/A3.16-
Revenue841K83.8M1%
Total Cash4.02M1.23M327%
Total Debt3.12M47.9M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QIND: Fundamental Ratings
QIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVDE65.61-0.47
-0.71%
Avantis International Equity ETF
UDEC35.60-0.26
-0.73%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec
BATT8.97-0.14
-1.52%
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
BUYZ38.55-0.94
-2.37%
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
PSC51.36-1.62
-3.06%
Principal US Small Cap ETF

AMROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMROF and ATLFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMROF and ATLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMROF
1D Price
Change %
AMROF100%
N/A
ATLFF - AMROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFGVF - AMROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QIND - AMROF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
JCSE - AMROF
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.90%
AITLF - AMROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QIND and CHHGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIND and CHHGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QIND
1D Price
Change %
QIND100%
+0.78%
CHHGF - QIND
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCHN - QIND
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREMF - QIND
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIZOF - QIND
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLFF - QIND
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More