AMS
Price
$3.14
Change
-$0.06 (-1.87%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.46M
64 days until earnings call
BACK
Price
$1.34
Change
-$0.01 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.31M
Ad is loading...

AMS vs BACK

Header iconAMS vs BACK Comparison
Open Charts AMS vs BACKBanner chart's image
American Shared Hospital Services
Price$3.14
Change-$0.06 (-1.87%)
Volume$200
Capitalization18.46M
IMAC Holdings
Price$1.34
Change-$0.01 (-0.74%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.31M
AMS vs BACK Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMS vs. BACK commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Hold and BACK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AMS: $3.20 vs. BACK: $1.36)
Brand notoriety: AMS and BACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMS: 133% vs. BACK: 33%
Market capitalization -- AMS: $18.46M vs. BACK: $3.31M
AMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $18.46M. BACK’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $3.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBACK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BACK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMS is a better buy in the long-term than BACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BACK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BACK is a better buy in the short-term than AMS.

Price Growth

AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.92% price change this week, while BACK (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +12.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.

BACK is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+3.19% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMS($18.5M) has a higher market cap than BACK($3.31M). BACK YTD gains are higher at: 7.087 vs. AMS (0.313). AMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.01M vs. BACK (-17.33M). AMS has more cash in the bank: 14.5M vs. BACK (247K). BACK has less debt than AMS: BACK (2.08M) vs AMS (13.4M). AMS has higher revenues than BACK: AMS (20.7M) vs BACK (10.7M).
AMSBACKAMS / BACK
Capitalization18.5M3.31M558%
EBITDA7.01M-17.33M-40%
Gain YTD0.3137.0874%
P/E Ratio41.86N/A-
Revenue20.7M10.7M193%
Total Cash14.5M247K5,870%
Total Debt13.4M2.08M643%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMS vs BACK: Fundamental Ratings
AMS
BACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64100
SMR RATING
1..100
53100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMS's Valuation (48) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as BACK (69). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to BACK’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BACK (100). This means that AMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BACK’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's SMR Rating (53) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BACK (100). This means that AMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BACK’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as BACK (52). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to BACK’s over the last 12 months.

AMS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as BACK (100). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to BACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMSBACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGLY3.600.52
+16.88%
Singularity Future Technology Ltd
OVLY26.781.03
+4.00%
Oak Valley Bancorp (CA)
ABCL3.060.09
+3.03%
AbCellera Biologics
FTS42.540.59
+1.41%
Fortis
PYCR22.120.02
+0.09%
Paycor HCM

AMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and SEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and SEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMS
1D Price
Change %
AMS100%
-0.62%
SEM - AMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
BKD - AMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
PNTG - AMS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
BACK - AMS
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
FMS - AMS
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

BACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BACK and HCSG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACK and HCSG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BACK
1D Price
Change %
BACK100%
+3.03%
HCSG - BACK
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
AGL - BACK
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.36%
BKDT - BACK
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
AVAH - BACK
10%
Poorly correlated
+6.45%
AMS - BACK
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More