Advertisement
AMS vs FLSW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMS is a Buy and FLSW is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.07% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +4.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+4.79% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AMS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLSW | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
AMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and SEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and SEM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| SEM - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BKD - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| PNTG - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| FMS - AMS | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| AMED - AMS | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
FLSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLSW has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLSW jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSW | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| ALC - FLSW | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| BAER - FLSW | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| CFR - FLSW | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| ROG - FLSW | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| AMS - FLSW | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||