It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMIH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMIH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMSF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while NMIH (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +2.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.98%.
AMSF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
NMIH is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
AMSF | NMIH | AMSF / NMIH | |
Capitalization | 960M | 2.62B | 37% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 27.059 | 28.942 | 93% |
P/E Ratio | 15.19 | 8.26 | 184% |
Revenue | 307M | 579M | 53% |
Total Cash | 356M | 333M | 107% |
Total Debt | 536K | 398M | 0% |
AMSF | NMIH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMSF's Valuation (81) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (90) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.
AMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.
AMSF's SMR Rating (51) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.
AMSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AMSF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.
NMIH's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AMSF (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that NMIH’s stock grew similarly to AMSF’s over the last 12 months.
AMSF | NMIH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago63% | 1 day ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago57% | 9 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMSF has been loosely correlated with EIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMSF jumps, then EIG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMSF | 100% | +0.40% | ||
EIG - AMSF | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
AIZ - AMSF | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
FAF - AMSF | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
ACT - AMSF | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
NMIH - AMSF | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMIH has been closely correlated with MTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMIH jumps, then MTG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NMIH | 100% | +0.92% | ||
MTG - NMIH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
ESNT - NMIH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
RDN - NMIH | 77% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
ACT - NMIH | 74% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
FNF - NMIH | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More |