AMXEF
Price
$0.92
Change
+$0.06 (+6.98%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
NG
Price
$3.78
Change
+$0.17 (+4.71%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:37 AM (EDT)
96 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMXEF vs NG

Header iconAMXEF vs NG Comparison
Open Charts AMXEF vs NGBanner chart's image
Amex Exploration
Price$0.92
Change+$0.06 (+6.98%)
Volume$88.66K
CapitalizationN/A
NovaGold Resources
Price$3.78
Change+$0.17 (+4.71%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AMXEF vs NG Comparison Chart
Loading...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AMXEF vs. NG commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMXEF is a Hold and NG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AMXEF: $0.92 vs. NG: $3.61)
Brand notoriety: AMXEF and NG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMXEF: 263% vs. NG: 57%
Market capitalization -- AMXEF: $166.71M vs. NG: $1B
AMXEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $166.71M. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMXEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMXEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMXEF and NG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AMXEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.22% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

NG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NG($1B) has a higher market cap than AMXEF($167M). NG YTD gains are higher at: -3.476 vs. AMXEF (-13.585). AMXEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.13M vs. NG (-33.7M). NG has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. AMXEF (3.37M). AMXEF (0) and NG (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMXEFNGAMXEF / NG
Capitalization167M1B17%
EBITDA-3.13M-33.7M9%
Gain YTD-13.585-3.476391%
P/E Ratio279.89N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.37M126M3%
Total DebtN/A138M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMXEF vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
AMXEF
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5019

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMXEF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (95) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

AMXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMXEF and DMIFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMXEF and DMIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMXEF
1D Price
Change %
AMXEF100%
+4.69%
DMIFF - AMXEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AG - AMXEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
NG - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
NEWP - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
MAG - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been loosely correlated with SAND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NG jumps, then SAND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
+0.84%
SAND - NG
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
MAG - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
EQX - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
-7.48%
CDE - NG
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
AEM - NG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More