AMXEF
Price
$1.14
Change
+$0.06 (+5.56%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
166.71M
NG
Price
$4.36
Change
-$0.33 (-7.04%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMXEF vs NG

Header iconAMXEF vs NG Comparison
Open Charts AMXEF vs NGBanner chart's image
Amex Exploration
Price$1.14
Change+$0.06 (+5.56%)
Volume$151.47K
Capitalization166.71M
NovaGold Resources
Price$4.36
Change-$0.33 (-7.04%)
Volume$11.49K
Capitalization1B
AMXEF vs NG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMXEF vs. NG commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMXEF is a Buy and NG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AMXEF: $1.14 vs. NG: $4.69)
Brand notoriety: AMXEF and NG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMXEF: 172% vs. NG: 289%
Market capitalization -- AMXEF: $166.71M vs. NG: $1B
AMXEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $166.71M. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMXEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMXEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMXEF is a better buy in the long-term than NG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMXEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMXEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMXEF is a better buy in the short-term than NG.

Price Growth

AMXEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.87% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was +31.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

NG is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NG($1B) has a higher market cap than AMXEF($167M). AMXEF YTD gains are higher at: 47.477 vs. NG (40.841). AMXEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.13M vs. NG (-33.7M). NG has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. AMXEF (3.37M). AMXEF (0) and NG (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMXEFNGAMXEF / NG
Capitalization167M1B17%
EBITDA-3.13M-33.7M9%
Gain YTD47.47740.841116%
P/E Ratio279.89N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.37M126M3%
Total DebtN/A138M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMXEF vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
AMXEF
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1614
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMXEF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (55) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

AMXEF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AMXEF’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMXEFNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGIFX15.190.12
+0.77%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 3
NLCCX31.99N/A
N/A
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
WLCGX54.13N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Growth Instl
VICCX21.62N/A
N/A
USA Mutuals Vice C
EAASX33.57N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A

AMXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMXEF and AG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMXEF and AG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMXEF
1D Price
Change %
AMXEF100%
+6.05%
AG - AMXEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
NG - AMXEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+24.40%
NEWP - AMXEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.48%
MAG - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
VGZ - AMXEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-15.43%
More

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been loosely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NG jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
+24.40%
CDE - NG
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.82%
MAG - NG
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
HL - NG
62%
Loosely correlated
+5.89%
FNV - NG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
SA - NG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
More