AMYZF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
81.59M
ECRAF
Price
$1.01
Change
+$0.02 (+2.02%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
378.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMYZF vs ECRAF

Header iconAMYZF vs ECRAF Comparison
Open Charts AMYZF vs ECRAFBanner chart's image
RECYCLICO BATTERY MATERIALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$714.37K
Capitalization81.59M
ECORA RESOURCES
Price$1.01
Change+$0.02 (+2.02%)
Volume$20.93K
Capitalization378.48M
AMYZF vs ECRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMYZF vs. ECRAF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMYZF is a Buy and ECRAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AMYZF: $0.05 vs. ECRAF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: AMYZF and ECRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMYZF: 374% vs. ECRAF: 128%
Market capitalization -- AMYZF: $81.59M vs. ECRAF: $378.48M
AMYZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $81.59M. ECRAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $378.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMYZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileECRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ECRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMYZF and ECRAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMYZF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ECRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMYZF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ECRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMYZF is a better buy in the short-term than ECRAF.

Price Growth

AMYZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +47.17% price change this week, while ECRAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECRAF($378M) has a higher market cap than AMYZF($81.6M). ECRAF YTD gains are higher at: 20.324 vs. AMYZF (-16.198). ECRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. AMYZF (-4.7M). AMYZF has more cash in the bank: 21.1M vs. ECRAF (5.72M). ECRAF has higher revenues than AMYZF: ECRAF (142M) vs AMYZF (0).
AMYZFECRAFAMYZF / ECRAF
Capitalization81.6M378M22%
EBITDA-4.7M149M-3%
Gain YTD-16.19820.324-80%
P/E RatioN/A3.72-
Revenue0142M-
Total Cash21.1M5.72M369%
Total DebtN/A45.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMYZF vs ECRAF: Fundamental Ratings
AMYZF
ECRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ECRAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMYZF (92). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AMYZF (100). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as AMYZF (95). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

ECRAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as AMYZF (47). This means that ECRAF’s stock grew similarly to AMYZF’s over the last 12 months.

AMYZF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECRAF (100). This means that AMYZF’s stock grew significantly faster than ECRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMYZFECRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ECRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPOX0.09N/A
+3.58%
GPO PLUS INC.
AIFLY1.15N/A
N/A
Aiful Corp.
NXDCF9.09N/A
N/A
NEXTDC Ltd, Brisbane QLD
WELNF12.20N/A
N/A
Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp.
FSUGY23.93-0.77
-3.12%
FORTESCUE LTD.

ECRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECRAF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECRAF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECRAF
1D Price
Change %
ECRAF100%
+2.02%
TMQ - ECRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
SGML - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
RIO - ECRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
UURAF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.66%
IPMLF - ECRAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More