AN
Price
$166.94
Change
-$0.03 (-0.02%)
Updated
Sep 16, 02:59 PM (EDT)
39 days until earnings call
BBW
Price
$30.72
Change
-$0.20 (-0.65%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:04 PM (EDT)
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AN vs BBW

Header iconAN vs BBW Comparison
Open Charts AN vs BBWBanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$166.94
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
Volume$459
CapitalizationN/A
Build-A-Bear Workshop
Price$30.72
Change-$0.20 (-0.65%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AN vs BBW Comparison Chart
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
BBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AN vs. BBW commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a StrongBuy and BBW is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (AN: $166.96 vs. BBW: $30.92)
Brand notoriety: AN and BBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 79% vs. BBW: 124%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.9B vs. BBW: $427.31M
AN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.9B. BBW’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $427.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBBW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BBW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBW is a better buy in the long-term than AN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BBW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the short-term than BBW.

Price Growth

AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while BBW (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Oct 25, 2024.

BBW is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.09% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($6.9B) has a higher market cap than BBW($427M). BBW has higher P/E ratio than AN: BBW (8.54) vs AN (7.25). BBW YTD gains are higher at: 36.481 vs. AN (11.173). AN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. BBW (75.3M). BBW has less debt than AN: BBW (78.4M) vs AN (8.03B). AN has higher revenues than BBW: AN (26.9B) vs BBW (470M).
ANBBWAN / BBW
Capitalization6.9B427M1,616%
EBITDA1.9B75.3M2,519%
Gain YTD11.17336.48131%
P/E Ratio7.258.5485%
Revenue26.9B470M5,723%
Total Cash60.8MN/A-
Total Debt8.03B78.4M10,247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs BBW: Fundamental Ratings
AN
BBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
105
SMR RATING
1..100
2624
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a21

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBW's Valuation (25) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (86). This means that BBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

BBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (10). This means that BBW’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

BBW's SMR Rating (24) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (26). This means that BBW’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

BBW's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (54). This means that BBW’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BBW (50). This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to BBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANBBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
BBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDM62.421.44
+2.36%
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
QQQA41.420.55
+1.35%
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF
PXJ28.080.14
+0.51%
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF
BSJQ23.450.03
+0.13%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 HY Corp Bd ETF
DBEF41.040.01
+0.02%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
+3.73%
PAG - AN
84%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
ABG - AN
82%
Closely correlated
+4.12%
GPI - AN
76%
Closely correlated
+5.62%
LAD - AN
74%
Closely correlated
+3.52%
SAH - AN
74%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
More

BBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBW has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBW jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBW
1D Price
Change %
BBW100%
-1.12%
HNST - BBW
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
LE - BBW
40%
Loosely correlated
+6.45%
DKS - BBW
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
CPRT - BBW
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
AN - BBW
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
More