ANDC
Price
$18.56
Change
+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.78M
FSGB
Price
$9.20
Change
-$0.10 (-1.08%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
9.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANDC vs FSGB

Header iconANDC vs FSGB Comparison
Open Charts ANDC vs FSGBBanner chart's image
Andover Ban
Price$18.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Volume$4.59K
Capitalization37.78M
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.20
Change-$0.10 (-1.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization9.32M
ANDC vs FSGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANDC vs. FSGB commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANDC is a Buy and FSGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ANDC: $18.56 vs. FSGB: $9.20)
Brand notoriety: ANDC and FSGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANDC: 196% vs. FSGB: 35%
Market capitalization -- ANDC: $37.78M vs. FSGB: $9.32M
ANDC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $37.78M. FSGB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANDC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANDC is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSGB’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FSGB’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANDC is a better buy in the short-term than FSGB.

Price Growth

ANDC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSGB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANDC($37.8M) has a higher market cap than FSGB($9.32M). ANDC (12.13) and FSGB (11.79) have similar P/E ratio . FSGB YTD gains are higher at: -4.167 vs. ANDC (-5.306).
ANDCFSGBANDC / FSGB
Capitalization37.8M9.32M406%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.306-4.167127%
P/E Ratio12.1311.79103%
Revenue18.2MN/A-
Total Cash26.2MN/A-
Total Debt9.85MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANDC vs FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
ANDC
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2897
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
48100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7374
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3495
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANDC's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (50). This means that ANDC’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

ANDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that ANDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

ANDC's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that ANDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

ANDC's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (74). This means that ANDC’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

ANDC's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (95). This means that ANDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANDCFSGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
4%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANDC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSW1.900.05
+2.70%
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd
ATLC65.37-0.20
-0.31%
Atlanticus Holdings Corp
AXON763.52-2.72
-0.35%
Axon Enterprise
FBLA11.67-0.15
-1.27%
FB Bancorp Inc
SEE32.28-0.47
-1.44%
Sealed Air Corp

ANDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANDC and PBHC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANDC and PBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANDC
1D Price
Change %
ANDC100%
N/A
PBHC - ANDC
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
CIBH - ANDC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
FSGB - ANDC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBO - ANDC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KISB - ANDC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with AOZOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then AOZOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
AOZOY - FSGB
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNPQY - FSGB
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
VWFB - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
ANDC - FSGB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More