It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANDE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANDE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VFS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANDE (@Food Distributors) experienced а +5.19% price change this week, while VFS (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +2.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.62%.
ANDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
VFS is expected to report earnings on Sep 19, 2025.
Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
@Motor Vehicles (+0.14% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
ANDE | VFS | ANDE / VFS | |
Capitalization | 1.92B | 11.6B | 17% |
EBITDA | 342M | -42.34T | -0% |
Gain YTD | -9.147 | -12.655 | 72% |
P/E Ratio | 19.19 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 14.8B | 22.64T | 0% |
Total Cash | 644M | 3.16T | 0% |
Total Debt | 665M | 73.22T | 0% |
ANDE | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANDE | VFS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago71% | 1 day ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 11 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago65% | 1 day ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANDE has been loosely correlated with SPTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANDE jumps, then SPTN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANDE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANDE | 100% | +2.27% | ||
SPTN - ANDE | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
PFGC - ANDE | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
USFD - ANDE | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
SYY - ANDE | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
HFFG - ANDE | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that VFS and RIVN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VFS and RIVN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VFS | 100% | -0.56% | ||
RIVN - VFS | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
LCID - VFS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
TSLA - VFS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
WKHS - VFS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
NIO - VFS | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.04% | ||
More |