Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANEW vs IWF
ANEW vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts ANEW vs IWF
ProShares MSCI Trnsfmtnl Chngs ETF
Price$50.45
Change+$0.30 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.84M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.82
Change-$0.01 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.63K
Net Assets112.55B
ANEW vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANEW vs. IWF commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANEW is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. ANEW (8.84M). ANEW has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: ANEW (11.521) vs IWF (6.977). ANEW was incepted earlier than IWF: ANEW (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ANEW (0.45). ANEW has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| ANEW | IWF | ANEW / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 11.521 | 6.977 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 8.84M | 113B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 12.00 | 350% |
| Yield | 0.96 | 0.42 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ANEW | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
More | ||||