ANGVF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
28.16M
CXBMF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
586.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANGVF vs CXBMF

Header iconANGVF vs CXBMF Comparison
Open Charts ANGVF vs CXBMFBanner chart's image
Angus Gold
Price$0.59
Change+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization28.16M
Calibre Mining
Price$2.17
Change-$0.04 (-1.81%)
Volume$1.43M
Capitalization586.8M
ANGVF vs CXBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANGVF vs. CXBMF commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANGVF is a Buy and CXBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ANGVF: $0.59 vs. CXBMF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: ANGVF and CXBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANGVF: 4% vs. CXBMF: 44%
Market capitalization -- ANGVF: $28.16M vs. CXBMF: $586.8M
ANGVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.16M. CXBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $586.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANGVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANGVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CXBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXBMF is a better buy in the long-term than ANGVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANGVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANGVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CXBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXBMF is a better buy in the short-term than ANGVF.

Price Growth

ANGVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CXBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.77% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXBMF($587M) has a higher market cap than ANGVF($28.2M). ANGVF YTD gains are higher at: 66.761 vs. CXBMF (45.638). CXBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. ANGVF (-8.16M). CXBMF has more cash in the bank: 58.3M vs. ANGVF (6.7M). CXBMF has higher revenues than ANGVF: CXBMF (429M) vs ANGVF (0).
ANGVFCXBMFANGVF / CXBMF
Capitalization28.2M587M5%
EBITDA-8.16M137M-6%
Gain YTD66.76145.638146%
P/E RatioN/A12.59-
Revenue0429M-
Total Cash6.7M58.3M11%
Total DebtN/A15.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXBMF: Fundamental Ratings
CXBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANGVFCXBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA297.813.87
+1.32%
Tesla
BTC.X108922.980000623.132800
+0.58%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME22.750.13
+0.57%
GameStop Corp
AAPL210.010.06
+0.03%
Apple
SPY620.34-0.34
-0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

ANGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANGVF and CBGZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANGVF and CBGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANGVF
1D Price
Change %
ANGVF100%
N/A
CBGZF - ANGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
PAFRF - ANGVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXK - ANGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.63%
CXBMF - ANGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - ANGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
-24.07%
More

CXBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXBMF has been closely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXBMF jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXBMF
1D Price
Change %
CXBMF100%
N/A
EQX - CXBMF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
AGI - CXBMF
66%
Loosely correlated
-5.84%
BTG - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.35%
ARMN - CXBMF
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.49%
AEM - CXBMF
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.92%
More