Ad is loading...
ANGVF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.04 (+13.79%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
PAFRF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

ANGVF vs PAFRF

Header iconANGVF vs PAFRF Comparison
Open Charts ANGVF vs PAFRFBanner chart's image
Angus Gold
Price$0.33
Change+$0.04 (+13.79%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Pan African Resources
Price$0.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$130
CapitalizationN/A
ANGVF vs PAFRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANGVF vs. PAFRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANGVF is a Hold and PAFRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ANGVF: $0.33 vs. PAFRF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: ANGVF and PAFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANGVF: 5% vs. PAFRF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ANGVF: $28.16M vs. PAFRF: $355.69M
ANGVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $28.16M. PAFRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $355.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANGVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAFRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANGVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAFRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAFRF is a better buy in the long-term than ANGVF.

Price Growth

ANGVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.87% price change this week, while PAFRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAFRF($356M) has a higher market cap than ANGVF($28.2M). PAFRF YTD gains are higher at: 74.286 vs. ANGVF (-17.477). PAFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 116M vs. ANGVF (-8.16M). PAFRF has more cash in the bank: 33.9M vs. ANGVF (6.7M). PAFRF has higher revenues than ANGVF: PAFRF (339M) vs ANGVF (0).
ANGVFPAFRFANGVF / PAFRF
Capitalization28.2M356M8%
EBITDA-8.16M116M-7%
Gain YTD-17.47774.286-24%
P/E RatioN/A6.24-
Revenue0339M-
Total Cash6.7M33.9M20%
Total DebtN/A86.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAFRF: Fundamental Ratings
PAFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROG103.64-0.37
-0.36%
Rogers Corp
IMPP3.48-0.03
-0.85%
Imperial Petroleum
TSM186.01-2.49
-1.32%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd
JZXN1.28-0.03
-2.29%
Jiuzi Holdings Inc.
KBR58.65-1.51
-2.51%
KBR

ANGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANGVF and CBGZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANGVF and CBGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANGVF
1D Price
Change %
ANGVF100%
+13.20%
CBGZF - ANGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
PAFRF - ANGVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSTYY - ANGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITRG - ANGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
GBBFF - ANGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
-11.83%
More

PAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAFRF and SVGAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAFRF and SVGAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAFRF
1D Price
Change %
PAFRF100%
N/A
SVGAF - PAFRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELTF - PAFRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRDMF - PAFRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PEXZF - PAFRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.22%
MWSNF - PAFRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
More