Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANMCX vs LTCQX
ANMCX vs LTCQX Comparison
Open Charts ANMCX vs LTCQX
AB Intermediate New York Municipal C
Price$13.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
Thornburg Ca Limited-Term Municipal C2
Price$13.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.34M
ANMCX vs LTCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANMCX vs. LTCQX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANMCX is a Hold and LTCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANMCX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. LTCQX (285M). LTCQX pays higher dividends than ANMCX: LTCQX (2.68) vs ANMCX (1.80). ANMCX was incepted earlier than LTCQX: ANMCX (24 years) vs LTCQX (5 years). LTCQX (2.89) is less costly to investors than ANMCX (1.50). LTCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.36 vs. ANMCX (33.00). ANMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTCQX: ANMCX (2500) vs LTCQX (5000). LTCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.15 vs. ANMCX (1.53). ANMCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.21 vs. LTCQX (2.69).
| ANMCX | LTCQX | ANMCX / LTCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.02 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.89 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.863 | 3.827 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 285M | 453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.68 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | 3.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.45 | 10.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.21 | 2.69 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement