Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANMCX vs SFCCX
ANMCX vs SFCCX Comparison
Open Charts ANMCX vs SFCCX
AB Intermediate New York Municipal C
Price$13.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-Fr C
Price$10.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
ANMCX vs SFCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANMCX vs. SFCCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANMCX is a Hold and SFCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANMCX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. SFCCX (336M). ANMCX pays higher dividends than SFCCX: ANMCX (1.80) vs SFCCX (1.42). ANMCX was incepted earlier than SFCCX: ANMCX (24 years) vs SFCCX (23 years). SFCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than ANMCX (1.50). ANMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. SFCCX (24.00). SFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANMCX: SFCCX (1000) vs ANMCX (2500). SFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. ANMCX (1.61). ANMCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.21 vs. SFCCX (1.27).
| ANMCX | SFCCX | ANMCX / SFCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.55 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.61 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.863 | 2.998 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 336M | 384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 2.55 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.53 | 9.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.21 | 1.27 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.84 | 2.42 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement