Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANMCX vs SFCCX
ANMCX vs SFCCX Comparison
Open Charts ANMCX vs SFCCX
AB Intermediate New York Municipal C
Price$13.40
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-Fr C
Price$10.29
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.52M
ANMCX vs SFCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANMCX vs. SFCCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANMCX is a Hold and SFCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANMCX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. SFCCX (343M). ANMCX pays higher dividends than SFCCX: ANMCX (1.82) vs SFCCX (1.42). ANMCX was incepted earlier than SFCCX: ANMCX (24 years) vs SFCCX (23 years). SFCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than ANMCX (1.50). ANMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. SFCCX (24.00). SFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANMCX: SFCCX (1000) vs ANMCX (2500). SFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. ANMCX (0.40). ANMCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.42 vs. SFCCX (0.66).
| ANMCX | SFCCX | ANMCX / SFCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.55 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.61 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.715 | 2.471 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 343M | 369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 2.14 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.60 | 7.04 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 0.66 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.53 | 2.46 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement