Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANMCX vs SFCNX
ANMCX vs SFCNX Comparison
Open Charts ANMCX vs SFCNX
AB Intermediate New York Municipal C
Price$13.40
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
Allspring California Ltd-Trm Tx-FrInst
Price$10.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.52M
ANMCX vs SFCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANMCX vs. SFCNX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANMCX is a Hold and SFCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANMCX has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. SFCNX (343M). SFCNX pays higher dividends than ANMCX: SFCNX (2.46) vs ANMCX (1.82). ANMCX was incepted earlier than SFCNX: ANMCX (24 years) vs SFCNX (11 years). ANMCX (1.50) is less costly to investors than SFCNX (0.54). ANMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. SFCNX (24.00). ANMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCNX: ANMCX (2500) vs SFCNX (1000000). SFCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. ANMCX (0.40). SFCNX return over 5 years is better than : 5.30 vs. ANMCX (1.42).
| ANMCX | SFCNX | ANMCX / SFCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.50 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.54 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.715 | 3.111 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 343M | 369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | 3.13 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.60 | 10.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.42 | 5.30 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.53 | 10.12 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement