ANPDF
Price
$11.86
Change
-$0.89 (-6.98%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
33.17B
BSFFF
Price
$28.12
Change
-$0.13 (-0.46%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs BSFFF

Header iconANPDF vs BSFFF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs BSFFFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$11.86
Change-$0.89 (-6.98%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization33.17B
Basic-Fit
Price$28.12
Change-$0.13 (-0.46%)
Volume$215
Capitalization2.24B
ANPDF vs BSFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. BSFFF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and BSFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $11.86 vs. BSFFF: $28.12)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and BSFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 2% vs. BSFFF: 86%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $33.17B vs. BSFFF: $2.24B
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $33.17B. BSFFF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBSFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BSFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the long-term than BSFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSFFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BSFFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the short-term than BSFFF.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -6.98% price change this week, while BSFFF (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.08% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($33.2B) has a higher market cap than BSFFF($2.24B). ANPDF YTD gains are higher at: 21.641 vs. BSFFF (20.430). ANPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5B vs. BSFFF (389M). ANPDF has more cash in the bank: 25.5B vs. BSFFF (43.3M). BSFFF has less debt than ANPDF: BSFFF (2.22B) vs ANPDF (19.2B). ANPDF has higher revenues than BSFFF: ANPDF (52.5B) vs BSFFF (795M).
ANPDFBSFFFANPDF / BSFFF
Capitalization33.2B2.24B1,485%
EBITDA11.5B389M2,956%
Gain YTD21.64120.430106%
P/E Ratio29.41N/A-
Revenue52.5B795M6,604%
Total Cash25.5B43.3M58,891%
Total Debt19.2B2.22B865%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs BSFFF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
BSFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8992
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8691
SMR RATING
1..100
3795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6126
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANPDF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSFFF (91). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (91). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSFFF (95). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

BSFFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (51). This means that BSFFF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

BSFFF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANPDF (61). This means that BSFFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDFBSFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGVDX26.360.08
+0.30%
American Funds Global Insight C
AWPIX21.74N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic I
SAUMX29.77N/A
N/A
SA US Small Company
REIZX14.61N/A
N/A
Third Avenue International RE Val Z
ACARX38.34N/A
N/A
Alger Capital Appreciation Instl R

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+15.87%
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-24.92%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.16%
More

BSFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSFFF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSFFF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSFFF
1D Price
Change %
BSFFF100%
N/A
THLPF - BSFFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDY - BSFFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
ANPDF - BSFFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - BSFFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - BSFFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More