ANPDF
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.27 (-2.56%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
29.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DSHK
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
25.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs DSHK

Header iconANPDF vs DSHK Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs DSHKBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$10.27
Change-$0.27 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization29.01B
Drive Shack
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$41.53K
Capitalization25.33M
ANPDF vs DSHK Comparison Chart in %
ANPDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DSHK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. DSHK commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and DSHK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $10.27 vs. DSHK: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and DSHK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 281% vs. DSHK: 318%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $29.01B vs. DSHK: $25.33M
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $29.01B. DSHK’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $25.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $32.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDSHK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DSHK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the long-term than DSHK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSHK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DSHK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the short-term than DSHK.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while DSHK (@Recreational Products) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.81% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($29B) has a higher market cap than DSHK($25.3M). DSHK YTD gains are higher at: 27.000 vs. ANPDF (5.333).
ANPDFDSHKANPDF / DSHK
Capitalization29B25.3M114,625%
EBITDAN/A-7.92M-
Gain YTD5.33327.00020%
P/E Ratio14.01N/A-
RevenueN/A341M-
Total CashN/A12.4M-
Total DebtN/A255M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs DSHK: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
DSHK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
37100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANPDF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as DSHK (46). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to DSHK’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DSHK (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to DSHK’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSHK (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSHK’s over the last 12 months.

DSHK's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (60). This means that DSHK’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSHK (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSHK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDFDSHK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DSHK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDIX1.30N/A
N/A
Cardiff Lexington Corporation
PCPJ0.50N/A
N/A
PaperClip, Inc.
MNHVF21.73N/A
N/A
Mowi ASA
PTALF0.29N/A
N/A
PetroTal Corp.
IWTNF11.73N/A
N/A
IWATANI CORP.

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More

DSHK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DSHK and ANPDF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSHK and ANPDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DSHK
1D Price
Change %
DSHK100%
+0.24%
ANPDF - DSHK
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOLF - DSHK
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
LTH - DSHK
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
TOMYY - DSHK
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - DSHK
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More