ANPDF
Price
$13.50
Change
+$2.32 (+20.75%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
34.2B
FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
123.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs FOCIF

Header iconANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs FOCIFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$13.50
Change+$2.32 (+20.75%)
Volume$1.71K
Capitalization34.2B
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization123.65M
ANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. FOCIF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and FOCIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $13.50 vs. FOCIF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and FOCIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 198% vs. FOCIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $34.2B vs. FOCIF: $123.65M
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $34.2B. FOCIF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $123.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFOCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the long-term than FOCIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ANPDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +18.21% price change this week, while FOCIF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +29.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+29.37% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($34.2B) has a higher market cap than FOCIF($124M). FOCIF has higher P/E ratio than ANPDF: FOCIF (55.37) vs ANPDF (17.85). ANPDF YTD gains are higher at: 38.462 vs. FOCIF (-31.880).
ANPDFFOCIFANPDF / FOCIF
Capitalization34.2B124M27,581%
EBITDAN/A15.2M-
Gain YTD38.462-31.880-121%
P/E Ratio17.8555.3732%
RevenueN/A163M-
Total CashN/A15.6M-
Total DebtN/A33.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs FOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
FOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8837
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
3690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
304
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (35). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (90). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (79). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (30). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDFFOCIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMA71.051.36
+1.95%
Comerica
BELFB140.421.11
+0.80%
Bel Fuse
CCIA25.46-0.04
-0.16%
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
PDSB1.28-0.01
-0.78%
PDS Biotechnology Corp
RCKT3.32-0.07
-2.06%
Rocket Pharmaceuticals

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+25.49%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and GMWKF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and GMWKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
GMWKF - FOCIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
GYYMF - FOCIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More