ANPDF
Price
$11.73
Change
-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
33.17B
FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs FOCIF

Header iconANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs FOCIFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$11.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
Volume$196.59K
Capitalization33.17B
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization433.79M
ANPDF vs FOCIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. FOCIF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and FOCIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $11.73 vs. FOCIF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and FOCIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 497% vs. FOCIF: 66%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $33.17B vs. FOCIF: $433.79M
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $33.17B. FOCIF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $433.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the long-term than FOCIF.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FOCIF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANPDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.73% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($33.2B) has a higher market cap than FOCIF($434M). ANPDF has higher P/E ratio than FOCIF: ANPDF (29.41) vs FOCIF (13.32). ANPDF YTD gains are higher at: 20.308 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). ANPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5B vs. FOCIF (36.4M). ANPDF has more cash in the bank: 25.5B vs. FOCIF (13.5M). FOCIF has less debt than ANPDF: FOCIF (26.8M) vs ANPDF (19.2B). ANPDF has higher revenues than FOCIF: ANPDF (52.5B) vs FOCIF (177M).
ANPDFFOCIFANPDF / FOCIF
Capitalization33.2B434M7,650%
EBITDA11.5B36.4M31,593%
Gain YTD20.308-31.880-64%
P/E Ratio29.4113.32221%
Revenue52.5B177M29,661%
Total Cash25.5B13.5M188,889%
Total Debt19.2B26.8M71,642%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs FOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
FOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
3890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (39). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (90). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (90). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANPDF (81). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KN17.200.55
+3.30%
KNOWLES Corp
RRBI56.000.57
+1.03%
Red River Bancshares
BLCO11.700.09
+0.78%
Bausch + Lomb Corp
NOC489.411.29
+0.26%
Northrop Grumman Corp
OMCC5.20N/A
N/A
Old Market Capital Corporation

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and GMWKF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and GMWKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
GMWKF - FOCIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
GYYMF - FOCIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.71%
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More