ANPDF
Price
$11.65
Change
-$0.70 (-5.67%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.17B
LNNGY
Price
$49.07
Change
-$1.35 (-2.68%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.89B
Ad is loading...

ANPDF vs LNNGY

Header iconANPDF vs LNNGY Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs LNNGYBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$11.65
Change-$0.70 (-5.67%)
Volume$366
Capitalization33.17B
Li Ning
Price$49.07
Change-$1.35 (-2.68%)
Volume$7.78K
Capitalization15.89B
ANPDF vs LNNGY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. LNNGY commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and LNNGY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $11.65 vs. LNNGY: $49.07)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and LNNGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 33% vs. LNNGY: 85%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $33.17B vs. LNNGY: $15.89B
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $33.17B. LNNGY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $15.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNNGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNNGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the long-term than LNNGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LNNGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LNNGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LNNGY (@Recreational Products) price change was -10.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -6.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-6.29% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($33.2B) has a higher market cap than LNNGY($15.9B). ANPDF has higher P/E ratio than LNNGY: ANPDF (29.41) vs LNNGY (26.32). ANPDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.487 vs. LNNGY (-5.289). ANPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.5B vs. LNNGY (6.97B). ANPDF has higher revenues than LNNGY: ANPDF (52.5B) vs LNNGY (25.8B).
ANPDFLNNGYANPDF / LNNGY
Capitalization33.2B15.9B209%
EBITDA11.5B6.97B165%
Gain YTD19.487-5.289-368%
P/E Ratio29.4126.32112%
Revenue52.5B25.8B203%
Total Cash25.5BN/A-
Total Debt19.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs LNNGY: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
LNNGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3851
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
3817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4275
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNNGY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (41). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGY (100). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew similarly to LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (38). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNNGY (75). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNNGY’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGY's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (79). This means that LNNGY’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNNGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LNNGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSY50.150.03
+0.06%
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
FSZ67.02-0.75
-1.10%
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX® ETF
BFEB40.31-1.45
-3.47%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Feb
EZJ34.04-3.09
-8.33%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
CONL13.50-2.06
-13.24%
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-13.07%
More

LNNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNNGY has been closely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNNGY jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGY
1D Price
Change %
LNNGY100%
-2.68%
ANPDY - LNNGY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
ANPDF - LNNGY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAS - LNNGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-12.28%
SMNNY - LNNGY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCFT - LNNGY
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.34%
More