ANPDY
Price
$254.14
Change
+$1.14 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.17B
BSFFF
Price
$23.96
Change
-$0.67 (-2.72%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
Ad is loading...

ANPDY vs BSFFF

Header iconANPDY vs BSFFF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDY vs BSFFFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$254.14
Change+$1.14 (+0.45%)
Volume$1.96K
Capitalization33.17B
Basic-Fit
Price$23.96
Change-$0.67 (-2.72%)
Volume$560
Capitalization2.24B
ANPDY vs BSFFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ANPDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDY vs. BSFFF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDY is a Hold and BSFFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDY: $254.14 vs. BSFFF: $23.96)
Brand notoriety: ANPDY and BSFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDY: 124% vs. BSFFF: 27%
Market capitalization -- ANPDY: $33.17B vs. BSFFF: $2.24B
ANPDY [@Recreational Products] is valued at $33.17B. BSFFF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBSFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BSFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDY is a better buy in the long-term than BSFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSFFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BSFFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSFFF is a better buy in the short-term than ANPDY.

Price Growth

ANPDY (@Recreational Products) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while BSFFF (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.21% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDY($33.2B) has a higher market cap than BSFFF($2.24B). BSFFF YTD gains are higher at: 2.612 vs. ANPDY (2.397). ANPDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.3B vs. BSFFF (389M). ANPDY has higher revenues than BSFFF: ANPDY (53.7B) vs BSFFF (795M).
ANPDYBSFFFANPDY / BSFFF
Capitalization33.2B2.24B1,485%
EBITDA16.3B389M4,190%
Gain YTD2.3972.61292%
P/E Ratio29.24N/A-
Revenue53.7B795M6,755%
Total CashN/A43.3M-
Total DebtN/A2.22B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDY vs BSFFF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDY
BSFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
1095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANPDY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSFFF (95). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew significantly faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (100). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSFFF (95). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew significantly faster than BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANPDY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BSFFF (56). This means that ANPDY’s stock grew similarly to BSFFF’s over the last 12 months.

BSFFF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANPDY (88). This means that BSFFF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANPDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDYBSFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ANPDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BSFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HESAX45.300.46
+1.03%
Horizon Defensive Core Advisor
MSACX15.890.08
+0.51%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq I
FSTKX31.780.10
+0.32%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
GONCX25.730.07
+0.27%
JHancock International Growth C
RISSX11.680.03
+0.26%
RBC International Small Cap Equity A

ANPDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDY has been closely correlated with LNNGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ANPDY jumps, then LNNGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDY
1D Price
Change %
ANPDY100%
+0.45%
LNNGY - ANPDY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
ANPDF - ANPDY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNNGF - ANPDY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAT - ANPDY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
WGO - ANPDY
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More

BSFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSFFF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSFFF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSFFF
1D Price
Change %
BSFFF100%
N/A
THLPF - BSFFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDY - BSFFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
ANPDF - BSFFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - BSFFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - BSFFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More