It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANRGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNZA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANRGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNZA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANRGF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -6.85% price change this week, while LNZA (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.
LNZA is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
ANRGF | LNZA | ANRGF / LNZA | |
Capitalization | 68.7M | 583M | 12% |
EBITDA | -42.11M | -100.93M | 42% |
Gain YTD | 196.296 | -80.716 | -243% |
P/E Ratio | 30.30 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 164M | 62.6M | 262% |
Total Cash | 65.5M | 121M | 54% |
Total Debt | 390M | 19.9M | 1,960% |
ANRGF | LNZA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago40% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago44% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago48% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago66% | 20 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 6 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 7 days ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSTRX | 9.90 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R | |||
MXYKX | 6.85 | N/A | N/A |
Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Instl | |||
NPNCX | 46.00 | -0.21 | -0.45% |
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C | |||
JPVZX | 14.18 | -0.12 | -0.84% |
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR2 | |||
YOVIX | 16.72 | -0.18 | -1.07% |
Yorktown Small-Cap Institutional |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ANRGF and ECLMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANRGF and ECLMF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANRGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANRGF | 100% | -6.67% | ||
ECLMF - ANRGF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LNZA - ANRGF | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
AGXXF - ANRGF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.31% | ||
TESI - ANRGF | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.48% | ||
SHMCF - ANRGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LNZA | 100% | -3.00% | ||
HAIUF - LNZA | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PESI - LNZA | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
QRHC - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
CLH - LNZA | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
MEG - LNZA | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
More |