ANSC
Price
$10.96
Change
+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
472.65M
BEAG
Price
$10.36
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
324.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSC vs BEAG

Header iconANSC vs BEAG Comparison
Open Charts ANSC vs BEAGBanner chart's image
Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition
Price$10.96
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Volume$596
Capitalization472.65M
Bold Eagle Acquisition
Price$10.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$2.78K
Capitalization324.45M
ANSC vs BEAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BEAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSC vs. BEAG commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSC is a StrongBuy and BEAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSC: $10.96 vs. BEAG: $10.36)
Brand notoriety: ANSC and BEAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSC: 4% vs. BEAG: 3%
Market capitalization -- ANSC: $472.65M vs. BEAG: $324.45M
ANSC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $472.65M. BEAG’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $324.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBEAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BEAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANSC is a better buy in the long-term than BEAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEAG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BEAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

ANSC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while BEAG (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANSC($473M) has a higher market cap than BEAG($324M). ANSC has higher P/E ratio than BEAG: ANSC (81.82) vs BEAG (28.00). BEAG YTD gains are higher at: 4.965 vs. ANSC (4.480). BEAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -679.48K vs. ANSC (-11.32M). BEAG has more cash in the bank: 132K vs. ANSC (1). BEAG has less debt than ANSC: BEAG (616K) vs ANSC (838K). ANSC (0) and BEAG (0) have equivalent revenues.
ANSCBEAGANSC / BEAG
Capitalization473M324M146%
EBITDA-11.32M-679.48K1,667%
Gain YTD4.4804.96590%
P/E Ratio81.8228.00292%
Revenue00-
Total Cash1132K0%
Total Debt838K616K136%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BEAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQRCF3.120.03
+0.84%
Black Mammoth Metals Corp
NFTM0.06N/A
+0.84%
The NFT Marketplace Inc.
ASXFF39.92N/A
N/A
ASX, Ltd.
PYTCY9.25N/A
N/A
Playtech PLC
RCRRF50.55N/A
N/A
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.

BEAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BEAG and MLACU have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEAG and MLACU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEAG
1D Price
Change %
BEAG100%
-0.10%
MLACU - BEAG
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSC - BEAG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
ASPCU - BEAG
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDAC - BEAG
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHACU - BEAG
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More