ANSC
Price
$10.96
Change
+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
472.65M
FACT
Price
$10.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
250.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSC vs FACT

Header iconANSC vs FACT Comparison
Open Charts ANSC vs FACTBanner chart's image
Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition
Price$10.96
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Volume$596
Capitalization472.65M
Fact II Acquisition
Price$10.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$463
Capitalization250.27M
ANSC vs FACT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSC vs. FACT commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSC is a StrongBuy and FACT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSC: $10.96 vs. FACT: $10.29)
Brand notoriety: ANSC and FACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSC: 4% vs. FACT: 1%
Market capitalization -- ANSC: $472.65M vs. FACT: $250.27M
ANSC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $472.65M. FACT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $250.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFACT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FACT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANSC and FACT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FACT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FACT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

ANSC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while FACT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANSC($473M) has a higher market cap than FACT($250M). ANSC YTD gains are higher at: 4.480 vs. FACT (3.939). FACT has more cash in the bank: 1.09M vs. ANSC (1).
ANSCFACTANSC / FACT
Capitalization473M250M189%
EBITDA-11.32MN/A-
Gain YTD4.4803.939114%
P/E Ratio81.82N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash11.09M0%
Total Debt838KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZOXF7.01N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
PQDI19.63-0.03
-0.18%
Principal Spectrum Tax-Adv Dvd Actv ETF
BSJT21.51-0.06
-0.28%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 HY Corp Bd ETF
SPUS48.62-0.25
-0.52%
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
NXG48.34-0.29
-0.61%
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund

FACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FACT and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FACT and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FACT
1D Price
Change %
FACT100%
-0.03%
PLMIU - FACT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - FACT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTAF - FACT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - FACT
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ANSC - FACT
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More