ANSC
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
471.36M
QETA
Price
$11.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
41.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSC vs QETA

Header iconANSC vs QETA Comparison
Open Charts ANSC vs QETABanner chart's image
Agriculture & Natural Solutions Acquisition
Price$10.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$652
Capitalization471.36M
Quetta Acquisition
Price$11.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization41.94M
ANSC vs QETA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSC vs. QETA commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSC is a StrongBuy and QETA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSC: $10.93 vs. QETA: $11.19)
Brand notoriety: ANSC and QETA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSC: 1% vs. QETA: 11%
Market capitalization -- ANSC: $471.36M vs. QETA: $41.94M
ANSC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $471.36M. QETA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $41.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQETA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QETA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANSC and QETA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QETA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QETA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

ANSC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while QETA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANSC($471M) has a higher market cap than QETA($41.9M). QETA has higher P/E ratio than ANSC: QETA (92.67) vs ANSC (81.60). QETA YTD gains are higher at: 6.066 vs. ANSC (4.194). QETA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.1M vs. ANSC (-11.32M). QETA has more cash in the bank: 244K vs. ANSC (1). QETA has less debt than ANSC: QETA (750K) vs ANSC (838K). ANSC (0) and QETA (0) have equivalent revenues.
ANSCQETAANSC / QETA
Capitalization471M41.9M1,124%
EBITDA-11.32M-1.1M1,025%
Gain YTD4.1946.06669%
P/E Ratio81.6092.6788%
Revenue00-
Total Cash1244K0%
Total Debt838K750K112%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QETA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QETA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPDV34.580.30
+0.87%
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
FINX33.430.20
+0.60%
Global X FinTech ETF
USTB51.050.06
+0.12%
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
QQJG26.32N/A
N/A
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
GBAT1.62-0.03
-1.82%
Grayscale Basic Attention Token Trust (BAT)

QETA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QETA and HSPOU have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QETA and HSPOU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QETA
1D Price
Change %
QETA100%
N/A
HSPOU - QETA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMC - QETA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJK - QETA
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
BOWNU - QETA
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVAC - QETA
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More