ANSLF
Price
$23.39
Change
-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
BBLG
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.01 (-0.98%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.87M
Ad is loading...

ANSLF vs BBLG

Header iconANSLF vs BBLG Comparison
Open Charts ANSLF vs BBLGBanner chart's image
Ansell
Price$23.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.06B
Bone Biologics
Price$1.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.98%)
Volume$98.51K
Capitalization1.87M
ANSLF vs BBLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BBLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSLF vs. BBLG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSLF is a Hold and BBLG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSLF: $23.39 vs. BBLG: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: ANSLF and BBLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSLF: 74% vs. BBLG: 40%
Market capitalization -- ANSLF: $2.06B vs. BBLG: $1.87M
ANSLF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $2.06B. BBLG’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $1.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBBLG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BBLG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANSLF is a better buy in the long-term than BBLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BBLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

ANSLF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BBLG (@Medical Specialties) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBLG is expected to report earnings on Aug 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-1.75% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANSLF($2.06B) has a higher market cap than BBLG($1.87M). BBLG YTD gains are higher at: 7.413 vs. ANSLF (-0.128). ANSLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 274M vs. BBLG (-9.43M). ANSLF has more cash in the bank: 206M vs. BBLG (3.03M). BBLG has less debt than ANSLF: BBLG (12.8M) vs ANSLF (486M). ANSLF has higher revenues than BBLG: ANSLF (1.78B) vs BBLG (0).
ANSLFBBLGANSLF / BBLG
Capitalization2.06B1.87M110,144%
EBITDA274M-9.43M-2,906%
Gain YTD-0.1287.413-2%
P/E Ratio15.46N/A-
Revenue1.78B0-
Total Cash206M3.03M6,805%
Total Debt486M12.8M3,797%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANSLF vs BBLG: Fundamental Ratings
ANSLF
BBLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
8999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4086
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
760
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANSLF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BBLG (27). This means that ANSLF’s stock grew similarly to BBLG’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as BBLG (100). This means that ANSLF’s stock grew similarly to BBLG’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BBLG (99). This means that ANSLF’s stock grew similarly to BBLG’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBLG (86). This means that ANSLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBLG’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBLG (60). This means that ANSLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BBLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESCGX10.760.01
+0.09%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG C
CREAX10.01-0.08
-0.79%
Columbia Real Estate Equity A
NSBRX62.65-0.72
-1.14%
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
FCNIX50.82-1.42
-2.72%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret I
ILLLX26.11-0.86
-3.19%
Transamerica Capital Growth C

ANSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANSLF has been loosely correlated with PXMBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANSLF jumps, then PXMBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANSLF
1D Price
Change %
ANSLF100%
N/A
PXMBF - ANSLF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MASI - ANSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
CNTGF - ANSLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMBBY - ANSLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBLG - ANSLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More