ANSLY
Price
$88.57
Change
+$9.57 (+12.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.3B
FSPKF
Price
$20.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSLY vs FSPKF

Header iconANSLY vs FSPKF Comparison
Open Charts ANSLY vs FSPKFBanner chart's image
Ansell
Price$88.57
Change+$9.57 (+12.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.3B
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare
Price$20.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$970
Capitalization13.06B
ANSLY vs FSPKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSLY vs. FSPKF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSLY is a Buy and FSPKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSLY: $88.57 vs. FSPKF: $20.01)
Brand notoriety: ANSLY and FSPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSLY: 157% vs. FSPKF: 161%
Market capitalization -- ANSLY: $3.3B vs. FSPKF: $13.06B
ANSLY [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $3.3B. FSPKF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $13.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $162.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANSLY is a better buy in the long-term than FSPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANSLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSPKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANSLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FSPKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANSLY is a better buy in the short-term than FSPKF.

Price Growth

ANSLY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +13.73% price change this week, while FSPKF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.24% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPKF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than ANSLY($3.3B). FSPKF has higher P/E ratio than ANSLY: FSPKF (53.26) vs ANSLY (31.86). ANSLY YTD gains are higher at: 7.307 vs. FSPKF (-0.941). FSPKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 654M vs. ANSLY (260M). FSPKF has more cash in the bank: 264M vs. ANSLY (88.5M). FSPKF has less debt than ANSLY: FSPKF (153M) vs ANSLY (806M). ANSLY has higher revenues than FSPKF: ANSLY (2B) vs FSPKF (1.28B).
ANSLYFSPKFANSLY / FSPKF
Capitalization3.3B13.1B25%
EBITDA260M654M40%
Gain YTD7.307-0.941-777%
P/E Ratio31.8653.2660%
Revenue2B1.28B156%
Total Cash88.5M264M34%
Total Debt806M153M527%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANSLY vs FSPKF: Fundamental Ratings
ANSLY
FSPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4849
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9145
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANSLY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSPKF (95). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew significantly faster than FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSPKF (100). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew similarly to FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

FSPKF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANSLY (91). This means that FSPKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANSLY’s over the last 12 months.

FSPKF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as ANSLY (58). This means that FSPKF’s stock grew similarly to ANSLY’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLY's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSPKF (98). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANSLYFSPKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTJL37.350.29
+0.78%
Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jul
IDHQ33.230.21
+0.64%
Invesco S&P International Dev Qual ETF
PSQO20.820.06
+0.29%
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
PAAA51.350.03
+0.06%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
XSEP41.430.01
+0.02%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep

ANSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANSLY has been loosely correlated with BRSYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANSLY jumps, then BRSYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANSLY
1D Price
Change %
ANSLY100%
+13.73%
BRSYF - ANSLY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IOBCF - ANSLY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VERO - ANSLY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSPKF - ANSLY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDEX - ANSLY
22%
Poorly correlated
-16.51%
More

FSPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSPKF and ANSLY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSPKF and ANSLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSPKF
1D Price
Change %
FSPKF100%
N/A
ANSLY - FSPKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.73%
OLYMY - FSPKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.87%
TMDX - FSPKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
BRSYF - FSPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCHBF - FSPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More