ANSLY
Price
$90.19
Change
+$1.62 (+1.83%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
FSPKF
Price
$21.79
Change
+$1.78 (+8.90%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANSLY vs FSPKF

Header iconANSLY vs FSPKF Comparison
Open Charts ANSLY vs FSPKFBanner chart's image
Ansell
Price$90.19
Change+$1.62 (+1.83%)
Volume$285
Capitalization3.09B
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare
Price$21.79
Change+$1.78 (+8.90%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.45B
ANSLY vs FSPKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANSLY vs. FSPKF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANSLY is a Buy and FSPKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ANSLY: $90.19 vs. FSPKF: $21.79)
Brand notoriety: ANSLY and FSPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANSLY: 170% vs. FSPKF: 121%
Market capitalization -- ANSLY: $3.09B vs. FSPKF: $12.45B
ANSLY [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $3.09B. FSPKF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $12.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $157.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANSLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANSLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANSLY is a better buy in the long-term than FSPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANSLY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSPKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANSLY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSPKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSPKF is a better buy in the short-term than ANSLY.

Price Growth

ANSLY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSPKF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +8.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.23% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPKF($12.5B) has a higher market cap than ANSLY($3.09B). FSPKF has higher P/E ratio than ANSLY: FSPKF (58.24) vs ANSLY (32.44). ANSLY YTD gains are higher at: 10.890 vs. FSPKF (7.871). FSPKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 654M vs. ANSLY (260M). FSPKF has more cash in the bank: 264M vs. ANSLY (88.5M). FSPKF has less debt than ANSLY: FSPKF (153M) vs ANSLY (806M). ANSLY has higher revenues than FSPKF: ANSLY (2B) vs FSPKF (1.28B).
ANSLYFSPKFANSLY / FSPKF
Capitalization3.09B12.5B25%
EBITDA260M654M40%
Gain YTD10.8907.871138%
P/E Ratio32.4458.2456%
Revenue2B1.28B156%
Total Cash88.5M264M34%
Total Debt806M153M527%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANSLY vs FSPKF: Fundamental Ratings
ANSLY
FSPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4949
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9145
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANSLY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSPKF (95). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew significantly faster than FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSPKF (100). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew similarly to FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

FSPKF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANSLY (91). This means that FSPKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANSLY’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FSPKF (49). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew similarly to FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

ANSLY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSPKF (98). This means that ANSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSPKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANSLYFSPKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANSLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEA11.330.05
+0.44%
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
HEWJ50.010.08
+0.16%
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
RHTX17.85N/A
N/A
RH Tactical Outlook ETF
QXQ30.77-0.13
-0.41%
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF
EVX38.26-0.23
-0.60%
VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF

ANSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANSLY has been loosely correlated with BRSYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANSLY jumps, then BRSYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANSLY
1D Price
Change %
ANSLY100%
N/A
BRSYF - ANSLY
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IOBCF - ANSLY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VERO - ANSLY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
FSPKF - ANSLY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDEX - ANSLY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
More

FSPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSPKF and ANSLY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSPKF and ANSLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSPKF
1D Price
Change %
FSPKF100%
N/A
ANSLY - FSPKF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLYMY - FSPKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
TMDX - FSPKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
BRSYF - FSPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCHBF - FSPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More