Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs CCGSX
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs CCGSX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$61.11
Change+$1.17 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$23.48
Change+$0.43 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets370.16M
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. CCGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and CCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCGSX (370M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: ANWPX (0.58) vs CCGSX (0.17). ANWPX was incepted earlier than CCGSX: ANWPX (52 years) vs CCGSX (9 years). CCGSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: ANWPX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. ANWPX (4.32). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.49 vs. ANWPX (47.91).
| ANWPX | CCGSX | ANWPX / CCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.13 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.610 | -1.243 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 370M | 36,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.17 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 6.85 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 23.56 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.91 | 72.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...