Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs CCGSX
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs CCGSX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.89
Change+$0.32 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$26.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.49M
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. CCGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and CCGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGSX (426M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: ANWPX (0.50) vs CCGSX (0.16). ANWPX was incepted earlier than CCGSX: ANWPX (53 years) vs CCGSX (9 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: ANWPX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. CCGSX (11.43). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 56.12 vs. ANWPX (31.87).
| ANWPX | CCGSX | ANWPX / CCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.11 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.746 | 13.239 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 426M | 37,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.16 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 11.43 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | 50.78 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.87 | 56.12 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement