Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs CCGSX
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs CCGSX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$72.44
Change-$0.63 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.46
Change-$0.26 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets441.05M
ANWPX vs CCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. CCGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and CCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGSX (441M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: ANWPX (0.47) vs CCGSX (0.15). ANWPX was incepted earlier than CCGSX: ANWPX (53 years) vs CCGSX (10 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: ANWPX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. ANWPX (12.26). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. ANWPX (27.28).
| ANWPX | CCGSX | ANWPX / CCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.11 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.632 | 18.766 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 441M | 36,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.15 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 15.37 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 55.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.28 | 51.34 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement