Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGEX
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGEX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$67.65
Change+$0.41 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$19.75
Change+$0.16 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.54M
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGEX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FCGEX (44.5M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGEX: ANWPX (0.53) vs FCGEX (0.21). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGEX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGEX (8 years). FCGEX (1.71) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGEX (7.00). ANWPX (6%) and FCGEX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGEX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGEX (15000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. FCGEX (-0.95). ANWPX (44.14) and FCGEX (43.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGEX | ANWPX / FCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.920 | 2.544 | 351% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 44.5M | 337,079% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.21 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.34 | -0.95 | -983% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 17.96 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | 43.43 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement