Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGEX
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGEX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$69.08
Change+$0.63 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.59B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$19.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.31M
ANWPX vs FCGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FCGEX (44.3M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGEX: ANWPX (0.53) vs FCGEX (0.21). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGEX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGEX (8 years). FCGEX (1.71) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGEX (19.00). ANWPX (6%) and FCGEX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGEX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGEX (15000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.99 vs. FCGEX (-1.53). FCGEX (51.11) and ANWPX (50.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGEX | ANWPX / FCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.71 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.222 | 2.908 | 386% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 44.3M | 345,372% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.21 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.99 | -1.53 | -716% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 23.80 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.27 | 51.11 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.01 | N/A | - |