Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$61.11
Change+$1.17 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$33.34
Change+$0.70 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.61M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HLGZX (510M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.58) vs HLGZX (0.49). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. HLGZX (-18.61). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 47.91 vs. HLGZX (-2.63).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.610 | -3.745 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 510M | 26,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.49 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | -18.61 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | -9.76 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.91 | -2.63 | -1,818% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...