Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$74.35
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.14B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$38.01
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets586.05M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. HLGZX (586M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.48) vs HLGZX (0.45). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.71 vs. HLGZX (-13.92). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.08 vs. HLGZX (-11.09).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.707 | 12.091 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 586M | 27,986% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.71 | -13.92 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.68 | 20.66 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.08 | -11.09 | -371% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement