Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$72.44
Change-$0.63 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.13
Change-$0.23 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.58M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and HLGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HLGZX (571M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.47) vs HLGZX (0.45). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. HLGZX (-14.19). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.28 vs. HLGZX (-17.97).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.632 | 10.174 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 571M | 28,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.45 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | -14.19 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 15.01 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.28 | -17.97 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement