Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$67.24
Change-$0.25 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$35.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.46M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. HLGZX (557M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.53) vs HLGZX (0.47). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. HLGZX (-14.85). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 43.80 vs. HLGZX (-8.65).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.662 | 5.308 | 163% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 557M | 27,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.47 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | -14.85 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.45 | 4.58 | 644% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.80 | -8.65 | -506% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement