Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$72.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.97B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.39
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.75M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. HLGZX (579M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.50) vs HLGZX (0.46). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.74 vs. HLGZX (-11.95). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. HLGZX (-12.44).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.439 | 9.997 | 164% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 579M | 27,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.46 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.74 | -11.95 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.09 | 11.07 | 389% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | -12.44 | -317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement