Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$71.33
Change-$0.36 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.04B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.72
Change-$0.11 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.84M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLGZX (573M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.50) vs HLGZX (0.46). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. HLGZX (-15.31). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.45 vs. HLGZX (-14.34).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.845 | 8.287 | 179% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 573M | 27,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.92 | -15.31 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.23 | 6.54 | 569% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.45 | -14.34 | -247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement