Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLGZX
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLGZX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$69.54
Change+$0.46 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.98B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.59
Change+$0.40 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.22M
ANWPX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. HLGZX (568M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWPX (0.53) vs HLGZX (0.47). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLGZX (8 years). HLGZX (0.77) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWPX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. HLGZX (-14.28). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.27 vs. HLGZX (-5.08).
| ANWPX | HLGZX | ANWPX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.963 | 7.903 | 151% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 568M | 27,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.47 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.75 | -14.28 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.05 | 15.46 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.27 | -5.08 | -1,010% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement