Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs NFACX
ANWPX vs NFACX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs NFACX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$73.03
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.12B
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$33.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.28M
ANWPX vs NFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. NFACX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and NFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. NFACX (806M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than NFACX: ANWPX (0.50) vs NFACX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than NFACX: ANWPX (53 years) vs NFACX (15 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: ANWPX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.77 vs. ANWPX (15.09). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. NFACX (23.73).
| ANWPX | NFACX | ANWPX / NFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.87 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.96 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.582 | 18.115 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 806M | 19,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.09 | 21.77 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.91 | 68.11 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 23.73 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.05 | -35.48 | -285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement