Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZAX vs MCOAX
ANZAX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts ANZAX vs MCOAX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$20.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
ANZAX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZAX vs. MCOAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZAX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. ANZAX (1.39B). MCOAX pays higher dividends than ANZAX: MCOAX (2.96) vs ANZAX (1.95). ANZAX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: ANZAX (15 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). ANZAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MCOAX (0.94). ANZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). ANZAX (6%) and MCOAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: ANZAX (2500) vs MCOAX (15000). ANZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.33 vs. MCOAX (12.83). ANZAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.03 vs. MCOAX (10.85).
| ANZAX | MCOAX | ANZAX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.94 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.652 | 11.174 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 1.62B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 2.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.33 | 12.83 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.34 | 20.46 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.03 | 10.85 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.81 | 46.18 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement