ANZFF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
BABWF
Price
$3.85
Change
+$0.20 (+5.48%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

ANZFF vs BABWF

Header iconANZFF vs BABWF Comparison
Open Charts ANZFF vs BABWFBanner chart's image
Air New Zealand
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
Price$3.85
Change+$0.20 (+5.48%)
Volume$12.3K
CapitalizationN/A
ANZFF vs BABWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BABWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZFF vs. BABWF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZFF is a Hold and BABWF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (ANZFF: $0.32 vs. BABWF: $3.85)
Brand notoriety: ANZFF and BABWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZFF: 6% vs. BABWF: 86%
Market capitalization -- ANZFF: $2.22B vs. BABWF: $18.37B
ANZFF [@Airlines] is valued at $2.22B. BABWF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $18.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $40.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $6.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBABWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BABWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BABWF is a better buy in the long-term than ANZFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BABWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BABWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BABWF is a better buy in the short-term than ANZFF.

Price Growth

ANZFF (@Airlines) experienced а -2.48% price change this week, while BABWF (@Airlines) price change was +5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+0.30% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABWF($18.4B) has a higher market cap than ANZFF($2.23B). ANZFF has higher P/E ratio than BABWF: ANZFF (13.05) vs BABWF (6.81). BABWF YTD gains are higher at: 93.467 vs. ANZFF (-23.435). BABWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.3B vs. ANZFF (1.12B). BABWF has more cash in the bank: 9.7B vs. ANZFF (1.28B). ANZFF has less debt than BABWF: ANZFF (2.82B) vs BABWF (16.1B). BABWF has higher revenues than ANZFF: BABWF (31.3B) vs ANZFF (6.75B).
ANZFFBABWFANZFF / BABWF
Capitalization2.23B18.4B12%
EBITDA1.12B4.3B26%
Gain YTD-23.43593.467-25%
P/E Ratio13.056.81192%
Revenue6.75B31.3B22%
Total Cash1.28B9.7B13%
Total Debt2.82B16.1B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZFF vs BABWF: Fundamental Ratings
ANZFF
BABWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZFF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BABWF (45). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to BABWF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BABWF (100). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to BABWF’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANZFF (89). This means that BABWF’s stock grew significantly faster than ANZFF’s over the last 12 months.

BABWF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZFF (58). This means that BABWF’s stock grew similarly to ANZFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BABWF (13). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to BABWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZFFBABWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BABWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVRRX85.340.83
+0.98%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core R5
REIAX13.890.11
+0.80%
West Loop Realty A
JGMCX21.030.14
+0.67%
Janus Henderson Triton C
MAIFX8.340.01
+0.12%
MoA International Fund
AISBX13.95N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small Cap Eq C

ANZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZFF and CHEAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZFF and CHEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZFF
1D Price
Change %
ANZFF100%
N/A
CHEAF - ANZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABWF - ANZFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALNPY - ANZFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGZNF - ANZFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBUY - ANZFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BABWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BABWF and ICAGY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BABWF and ICAGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BABWF
1D Price
Change %
BABWF100%
N/A
ICAGY - BABWF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
WZZZY - BABWF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAL - BABWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
JAPSY - BABWF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
DLAKY - BABWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More