ANZFF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
CEBUY
Price
$1.50
Change
-$1.72 (-53.42%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
350.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZFF vs CEBUY

Header iconANZFF vs CEBUY Comparison
Open Charts ANZFF vs CEBUYBanner chart's image
Air New Zealand
Price$0.35
Change+$0.01 (+2.94%)
Volume$11.16K
Capitalization2.29B
Cebu Air
Price$1.50
Change-$1.72 (-53.42%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization350.14M
ANZFF vs CEBUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZFF vs. CEBUY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZFF is a Hold and CEBUY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZFF: $0.35 vs. CEBUY: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: ANZFF and CEBUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZFF: 237% vs. CEBUY: 891%
Market capitalization -- ANZFF: $2.29B vs. CEBUY: $350.14M
ANZFF [@Airlines] is valued at $2.29B. CEBUY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $350.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $37.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCEBUY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CEBUY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANZFF is a better buy in the long-term than CEBUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEBUY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CEBUY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEBUY is a better buy in the short-term than ANZFF.

Price Growth

ANZFF (@Airlines) experienced а +2.48% price change this week, while CEBUY (@Airlines) price change was -18.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (-3.67% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANZFF($2.29B) has a higher market cap than CEBUY($350M). ANZFF has higher P/E ratio than CEBUY: ANZFF (16.02) vs CEBUY (1.88). ANZFF YTD gains are higher at: 8.469 vs. CEBUY (-18.919). CEBUY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37B vs. ANZFF (1.12B). CEBUY has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. ANZFF (1.28B). ANZFF has less debt than CEBUY: ANZFF (2.82B) vs CEBUY (175B). CEBUY has higher revenues than ANZFF: CEBUY (117B) vs ANZFF (6.75B).
ANZFFCEBUYANZFF / CEBUY
Capitalization2.29B350M653%
EBITDA1.12B37B3%
Gain YTD8.469-18.919-45%
P/E Ratio16.021.88851%
Revenue6.75B117B6%
Total Cash1.28B23.4B5%
Total Debt2.82B175B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZFF vs CEBUY: Fundamental Ratings
ANZFF
CEBUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3394
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8815
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5989
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZFF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBUY (38). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBUY (100). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

CEBUY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ANZFF (88). This means that CEBUY’s stock grew significantly faster than ANZFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBUY (89). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEBUY (93). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZFFCEBUY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEFRX9.12N/A
N/A
Templeton Foreign R
HDGYX37.84N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth Y
SNTFX21.47N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced International R6
GSAFX28.67N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
EPSIX25.09-0.15
-0.59%
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Inv Class

ANZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZFF and CHEAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZFF and CHEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZFF
1D Price
Change %
ANZFF100%
N/A
CHEAF - ANZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABWF - ANZFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALNPY - ANZFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
AGZNF - ANZFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBUY - ANZFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CEBUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEBUY and ALNPY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEBUY and ALNPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEBUY
1D Price
Change %
CEBUY100%
N/A
ALNPY - CEBUY
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
AIABF - CEBUY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRYY - CEBUY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZLY - CEBUY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZFF - CEBUY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More