ANZFF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
CHEAF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.02 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
11.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANZFF vs CHEAF

Header iconANZFF vs CHEAF Comparison
Open Charts ANZFF vs CHEAFBanner chart's image
Air New Zealand
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization2.29B
China Eastern Airlines
Price$0.34
Change-$0.02 (-5.56%)
Volume$3.46K
Capitalization11.04B
ANZFF vs CHEAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANZFF vs. CHEAF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZFF is a Hold and CHEAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (ANZFF: $0.34 vs. CHEAF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: ANZFF and CHEAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANZFF: 85% vs. CHEAF: 70%
Market capitalization -- ANZFF: $2.29B vs. CHEAF: $11.04B
ANZFF [@Airlines] is valued at $2.29B. CHEAF’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $11.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $35.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $7.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANZFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCHEAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANZFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CHEAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANZFF is a better buy in the long-term than CHEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANZFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHEAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANZFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CHEAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHEAF is a better buy in the short-term than ANZFF.

Price Growth

ANZFF (@Airlines) experienced а +11.60% price change this week, while CHEAF (@Airlines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+2.93% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHEAF($11B) has a higher market cap than ANZFF($2.29B). ANZFF YTD gains are higher at: 5.849 vs. CHEAF (3.761). ANZFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. CHEAF (-2.18B). CHEAF has more cash in the bank: 6.75B vs. ANZFF (1.28B). ANZFF has less debt than CHEAF: ANZFF (2.82B) vs CHEAF (185B). CHEAF has higher revenues than ANZFF: CHEAF (132B) vs ANZFF (6.75B).
ANZFFCHEAFANZFF / CHEAF
Capitalization2.29B11B21%
EBITDA1.12B-2.18B-51%
Gain YTD5.8493.761156%
P/E Ratio15.88N/A-
Revenue6.75B132B5%
Total Cash1.28B6.75B19%
Total Debt2.82B185B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANZFF vs CHEAF: Fundamental Ratings
ANZFF
CHEAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7399
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8794
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
995
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANZFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHEAF (89). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHEAF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEAF (100). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to CHEAF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CHEAF (94). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew similarly to CHEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CHEAF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ANZFF (56). This means that CHEAF’s stock grew similarly to ANZFF’s over the last 12 months.

ANZFF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHEAF (95). This means that ANZFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANZFFCHEAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGPSX38.91N/A
N/A
ProFunds Large Cap Growth Svc
DHMIX26.56N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap I
IJSSX13.53N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity S
VAFIX34.22N/A
N/A
Invesco American Franchise Y
MMUHX24.91N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities R3

ANZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANZFF and CHEAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANZFF and CHEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANZFF
1D Price
Change %
ANZFF100%
-0.38%
CHEAF - ANZFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABWF - ANZFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALNPY - ANZFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
AGZNF - ANZFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBUY - ANZFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CHEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHEAF and ANZFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHEAF and ANZFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHEAF
1D Price
Change %
CHEAF100%
N/A
ANZFF - CHEAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
HRBR - CHEAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%